Wikipedia is one of the world’s most popular websites. The collaborative encyclopedia liberated information previously only available to those who could afford it. However, the site is not without its weaknesses.
Editorial disagreements, heated debates, and controversial subject matter have made the site noteworthy for the wrong reasons.
Everipedia is a blockchain-based Wikipedia alternative that aims to tackle some of Wikipedia’s biggest problems. So, we’re going to pit Everipedia vs. Wikipedia and help you decide which online encyclopedia you should use.
What is a Wiki?
If you’ve ever visited Wikipedia, then you’ve browsed a wiki. They are generally used to collect information, whether that’s in the form of an encyclopedia like Wikipedia, or a company’s internal intranet pages. The first wiki was created back in 1995, but the style has gone on to become a cornerstone of the internet.
Rather than having just a few people collate information, wikis facilitate collaboration and, in theory, allow for greater coverage of topics and discussions than any single person could generate.
It’s this openness that made Wikipedia so successful. By allowing anyone in the world to add information, the site was able to attract specialists in all areas.
As a wiki is open, it also creates transparency. Other users can see which edits were made, by which user, and when. Consensus then dictates whether the changes are accepted or reverted.
The Problem with Wikipedia
While anyone can edit Wikipedia, very few people actually do. Despite being the 10th most popular website in the world, the site only has just over 315,000 active users. To be classed as an active user, the account must have made at least one edit in the preceding month—a low bar for classification. So, the actual figure of the most active users is likely even lower.
This creates the exact issue Wikipedia hoped to avoid; the control of information by a small minority. Back in 2009, a total of 73.4 percent of all edits on the site were made solely by the most active two percent of users. While these numbers may have changed in the years since, there is no indication that the problem has gone away.
Not only does this deter others from getting involved, but it has also prevented the site from addressing its credibility issue. If you talk to academics and educators around the world, they’ll tell you Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information. This has been the case for almost the site’s entire history. It’s a problem the decentralized Twitter alternatives are attempting to tackle, too.
The most active users maintain a hold on page creation, too. As Wikipedia pages are only allowed on the grounds of notability, these users effectively decide what is notable. Given Wikipedia’s popularity, millions of people each day use the site and are only getting a sample of what a relatively small amount of people deem notable.
What Is Everipedia?
Everipedia is a Wikipedia alternative that strips away the bureaucracy of the popular online encyclopedia. The name is a portmanteau of everyone and encyclopedia, taking aim at what the site’s founders see as Wikipedia’s biggest problem.
Unlike its established competitor, the site allows anyone to create a page on Everipedia. This, in theory, gives control back to the users of the site to determine what is and isn’t notable and worthy of entry.
Everipedia is also noticeably more modern than its fellow wiki-based sites. The company intentionally put a lot of work in the interface of the site, so that people aren’t put off but the technical knowledge needed to navigate and create pages.
Wikipedia has almost two decades of page development, while Everipedia only launched in 2015. To catch up, Everipedia imported all English Wikipedia pages as a starting point. This still makes up the bulk of Everipedia’s content.
In a January 2019 interview with one of the company’s founders, it was revealed that Everipedia has just 7,000 contributors—a long way off from reaching Wikipedia levels.
How Does Everipedia Work?
To incentivize people to make the switch from Wikipedia, the company developed a blockchain-based token called IQ. Users are compensated for their involvement in the site—editing, page creation, discussions, and voting—with IQ tokens.
There are 500 tokens distributed every 30 minutes, with 80 percent given to the user proposing an edit and 20 percent to the majority voters. This sounds complex, but it’s actually quite straightforward to create your own cryptocurrency.
Amassing IQ tokens is essential, too. They represent your right to vote for a proposed edit, with some of your IQ locked in until the vote closes.
From the homepage, clicking on the Activity section will take you to all live edit proposals that are open for voting. You can log in to Everipedia with one of your social media accounts, but only if you don’t want to participate in editing and voting.
To be an active user, you need to sign in via Scatter, after first purchasing EOS cryptocurrency. This is because Everipedia is based on the EOS blockchain. This allows them to issue to tokens, and also make the site resistant to censorship.
Will You Switch to Everipedia?
Wikipedia grew from humble beginnings to be one of the largest and most popular sites in the world. The founders’ goal was ambitious; to allow anyone to access the sum of all human knowledge.
However, as the site has no central authority overseeing things, a small minority of users maintain control of what can and can’t be posted on Wikipedia. Everipedia wants to change that, and return the online encyclopedia to its original intention of truly open knowledge.
The for-profit site is, for now, primarily a Wikipedia clone with some additional articles and features. However, creating the Everipedia blockchain and issuing IQ tokens may be the key to ensuring its long-term future.
Everipedia isn’t the only site to reward user-generated content, either. Before jumping into Everipedia, you may also be interested in taking a look at how the Steemit social media site works.
We earn commission if you purchase items using an affiliate link. We only recommend products we trust. See our affiliate disclosure.